Tate Gran-Ulsaker on LinkedIn: The Joe Rogan Situation is Crazy (2024)

Trust will always be misplaced and abused from power-centers. The more powerful the structure, the more disconnected, the more tempted, the more corrupt, the more fraudulent and eventually criminal. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. So who can you trust? We might look to the spirit world or the self or the family. Local and personal connections certainly have a better chance of showing care and love than a faceless entity or consolidated power-centers. Why ever put trust in a commercial or a political speech or a regulator's mission statement? This will always end up misplaced trust.

Medical professionals that have remained true to their oath of "do no harm" have voiced disbelief at the medical institutions recommending that pregnant mothers and babies take an experimental injection. This was an unprecedented decision never done before some have claimed. And now we are discovering once again that the early whistleblowers were right to throw caution on this gene therapy for the genetic risks that it holds for future generations. As Dr McCullough says, more research is needed but the risks are there to be resolved and this is after 5/8th of our planet took this "treatment". Will there be any reflection on what we do and how we get into these situations?

1

Trust was sold in Australia, and around the world. Everything has a price, even health and livelihoods and lives themselves, as we found out. I disagree it is about getting trust back. That is a dead end goal because it was never about trust. It was about an industry that allows bad actors to remain un-prosecutable no matter what their product does to people while earning 58-to-1 return on investment. Trust would no longer be an issue if penalties for causing harm were severe. Every other industry we see in operation in our cities are trustworthy by comparison because they have to be or they are prosecuted out of business in a few months. Fix the system and you fix the trust issue.

4

Representational governance, a rare thing. Do we even know it when we see it?

3

Vaccines are a poor model for medicine development and distribution. The model can't work because there seems to be no recourse against criminal behavior in the vaccine industry. Also, the profits are reported to be 58 dollars returned for every 1 dollar invested. I wonder if that includes all the payouts to incentivise uptake and lobby for mandates?

2

Cognitive dissonance is required to believe these companies when their courtroom convictions history is full of some of the worst corporate crimes ever committed on record.

4

1 Comment

What happens when the least regulated category of medicine no longer meets rigorous testing standards? Beyond the financial benefits of bypassing thorough clinical research, which increases profit margins per dose, what risks do these inadequately regulated medicines pose? An investigation might be needed to:* explore potential conflicts of interest, * explore the removal of incentives that heighten patient risks, * find and study affected patients, and * construct strategies to comprehensively reform the regulatory system.The people over at McCullough Foundation seem to be doing more positive things for society than all those regulatory agencies combined on this topic.

5

9 Comments

Three governments have opted not to investigate excess deaths. The medical and scientific communities are questioning why a scientific investigation cannot follow the science of statistics. Their request is straightforward: Why not examine this unprecedented level of deaths, which parallels the impact of a major war? Does a decision against investigation suggest a reluctance to uncover a known cause?

17

1 Comment